While the BP oil spill catastrophe still dominates news headlines, will US law makers squander the opportunity to finally pass a bill that will pave for cleaner energy? 63% of American’s hope not according to the latest poll by the Wall Street Journal & NBC News. In fact, the poll shows that Americans want a comprehensive energy reform bill even if it means increasing the cost of energy. Treehugger.com blogger, Brian Merchant, hopes that the Senate is listening and would ideally like to see the bill amped up and include green job provisions (the only other concern topping energy according to the poll). He contends, however, that in our re-election, incumbent-threatened environment the Senate will go the route of a “safe, voter-approved” energy bill.
Well, if the Senate isn’t listening, perhaps the USDA is. The USDA has just released its report titled “USDA Biofuels Strategic Production Report” which Ethanol Producer Magazine summed up as a regional roadmap to meeting biofuel goals of the RFS2 (Renewable Fuel Standards) by 2022. The good news is that to meet the biofuel goals it would require the building of 527 more biorefineries. The bad news is that comes at the cost of $168 billion which breaks down to be $8 dollars per gallon, according to the report. Yikes!
Natural gas has long been touted as abundant and cheap and is being increasingly used for “environmentally friendly” electricity generation. Wait, I thought this was blog about transportation? Well it is. Electricity generation will become more and more tied to transportation as electric vehicles take to the roads. One of the underlying arguments to how “green” electric cars actually comes down to how that electricity is produced. Which brings me back to natural gas…Chris Vernon at The Oil Drum: Europe, questions whether or not natural gas is truly the greener choice. According to Vernon, “natural gas (CH4) itself is a potent greenhouse gas, and its release to the atmosphere without being burnt can quickly compensate for the CO2 advantage against coal.” He calls into question the methodology used to calculate power station emissions because they don’t take into account the upstream supply system such as pipeline leaks and gas released during coal mining. Although, wouldn’t that add to coal’s emission still making natural gas for electricity production preferable to coal? True, concedes the author. He doesn’t discount that natural gas is greener but thinks as our power generation shifts towards natural gas these factors should be considered.
Which brings me to electric vehicles…the race is still on between the GM Volt and the Nissan LEAF. With the Nissan leaf selling out its pre-orders, GM is hoping to follow suit. GM is banking on “early adopters” to pave the way. Its early adopters, says GM’s marketing chief, Jim Campbell to GM-Volt blog site (not affiliated with GM), will “have an amazing appreciation for technology combined with a green or eco-imperative in their lives.”
Are you an early adopter? If so, perhaps you pre-ordered the Nissan LEAF? Now your Nissan LEAF will be equipped with a noise maker for safety’s sake. Automotive Fleet describes the noises as “a soft whine that fluctuates in intensity with the vehicle’s speed” and “a clanging sound” when going in reverse. “Whine” and “clanging”? Really? I think I can feel the cringe in Nissan’s marketing department.
The Obama administration hopes to nudge entire communities to be “early adopters” of electric vehicles by enticing them with subsidies via the Electric Vehicle Deployment Act of 2010. The legislation is still in its infancy reports Plugincars.com , but has already garnered some big name support including Senator Byron Dorgan who chairs the Energy and Natural Resources Committee and co-authored the bill. One major criticism of the bill is that it’s a sign of government “picking a winner”. That might be the case, but I think we can all agree that Big Oil’s been “winning” for way too long.
Written by Falana White
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the Alternative Fuel Vehicle Institute.
